Firm ashok traders case
WebIn Firm Ashok Traders vs Gurmukh Das Saluja , the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India enunciated that the Non-Signatories cannot approach the doors of the Courts for the … WebOn 22-7-2003, Gurumukh Das Saluja of Group ‘A’ filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 wherein the principal relief sought for is the …
Firm ashok traders case
Did you know?
WebHowever, the court disagreed and distinguished the facts of Dirk India from the case at hand. It upheld the submissions of the Petitioner that a stay under Section 9 as an … WebAug 25, 2004 · Firm Ashok Traders came up for consideration before the Supreme Court in the case of U.P State Sugar Corporation Limited v. Jain Construction...) Ltd. We may, …
WebAshok Traders started it’s journey in the Telecom Industry with a Distribution Network of the Institutional Segment for Bharti Teletech’s various Brands of instruments to all EPABX … WebSep 17, 2024 · In Firm Ashok Traders case, the Supreme Court held that a party moving the Court under Section 9 must ensure that arbitral proceedings are commenced within reasonable time.
WebJul 16, 2012 · The critics welcomed the decision of Firm Ashok Traders [63] as laying down further disability and thus making registration even more urgent. But now though a suit is not maintainable in a Court of law but arbitration proceeding is not hit by the bar. So a short cut has been given to the partnership firms which is un- called for. WebOn 6.3.2003 auction for IMFL and country-liqour shops (60 in number) for the year 2003-04 was held at Bhopal. M/s Ashok Traders was declared to be successful bidder for a …
http://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/firm-ashok-traders-and-anr-etc-vs-gurumukh-das-saluja-and-ors-etc
WebJul 1, 2009 · Kajaria Traders (India) Ltd., AIR 1964 SC 1882, noticed that the said decision was distinguished by the Supreme Court in the case of Firm Ashok Traders, (supra) and held that the bar under Section 69 would be available to be raised in a proceeding before the Arbitrator under the Arbitration Act. black beans iodine contentWebOne other advantage in hearing the respondent before the closing of application is the clue that we get from Firm Ashok Traders' case [(2004) 3 SCC 155], cited supra, where the Supreme Court encouraged the parties to suggest a solution. If that is really possible, then even at the initial stage, the entire matter will come to a happy resolution. black beans in the pressure cookerWebJan 17, 2024 · In Firm Ashok Traders the Supreme Court has held that the reliefs which the court may allow to a party under clauses (i) and (ii) of Section 9 flow from the power … black beans in waterWebNov 19, 2024 · Decision On Date Of Reckoning Requires Investigation, Madras High Court Applies Nortel Principle, Appoints Retd Justice Chandru As Arbitrator. 5 Jan 2024 7:15 AM GMT. black beans iodineWebMay 9, 2024 · In Firm Ashok Traders, the Supreme Court had observed, "'a person not party to an arbitration agreement cannot enter the court for protection under Section 9." ... Case No.: C/SCA/16131/2024 . black bean sizeWebMr.Jahagirdar learned senior counsel placed reliance on the judgment of Supreme Court in case of Ashok Traders (Firm) and Another vs. Gurumukh Das Sanuja and others AIR 2004 SC 1433. Reliance is placed on paragraphs 6, 13 and 17. black beans ironWebMay 21, 2015 · He would rely upon the following judgments in support of his submissions: “1. Ashok Kumar v. SBI Officers Association (Delhi Circle ), 201 (2013) DLT 433 2. O.A No. 461 of 2010, decided on 28th April, 2010 (Madras High Court) 3. Javed Rahat v. Bar Council of India, 129 (2006) DLT 104 (DB) 4. black beans iron amount